U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution Is Void

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

“There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court.”

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

“Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts.”

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

Read full story at:

"There is no Left or Right. There is only Tyranny and Freedom."

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in america, freedom, news, police state, politics, random, uncategorized
6 comments on “U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution Is Void
  1. […] U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution Is Void (mountainrepublic.net) […]


  2. steve says:

    There’s no doubt the Supreme Court is corrupt. Just before Obama was sworn in, Chief Justice John Roberts had a private meeting with B. Obama, know that cases were coming before the Court concerning his eligibility. Of course meeting with new presidents is not unusual, but not when pending cases are in play. Clearly, a conflict of interest, and we can now see the Court won’t hear any eligibility cases.
    That’s just one small example of the overall corruption in every branch of the U.S. government.


  3. DarcsFalcon says:

    This is appalling.

    I was just reading something last night, and I don’t have the link now, but the article was talking about how states are suing over the whole Obamacare debacle, and how some states are looking into the “null” thing. (being able to declare federal things like Obamacare null and void and thus making themselves exempt from it) My understanding was that states have the sovereign right to overrule the SCOTUS in certain cases, like when SCOTUS makes rulings that are unconstitutional.

    There was mention of a case in 1957, when SCOTUS decided that it was the supreme law of the land, but I think some states are looking into whether or not that’s constitutional.


  4. Marberry vs Madison gives court right of judicial review. That’s how things like segregation got declared unconstitutional so it is normal and encoded part of checks and balances. I have felt this protocol of judicial review should not be an exclusive power for the supreme court and should extend to any and all judges and was not sure if it was but it seems the court has now affirmed that is legal. Federal judges and state supreme court judges have been declaring things unconstitutional for many years. Of course there are ways to remove corrupt judges and invalidate their decisions if designed to accommodate special interests. Many arrest procedures were quite unconstitutional and were so declared which is the reason for the benefit of Miranda and other protections for the arrestee. Thurgood Marshall pioneered this advocacy. Just because the congress or state legislature makes a law does not mean it is constitutional. For example it was constitutional and lawful that four and a half million blacks could be held as slaves in this country. When I was a youth it was the law here in Miami that a black person could not be on Miami Beach after 6:00 PM , Jews were denied hotel accommodations and Irish need not apply. I grew up in the Jim Crow south and am sensitive to the many injustices of the law. The legislature makes the laws, the executive enforces the laws and the courts interpret the law to decide if it is constitutional. That’s why we have almost 30 amendments. Laws were not constitutional. Once the courts become subservient to the legislature or executive we are all in big trouble


Comments are closed.

Just look at us. Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, major media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.

Michael Ellner

If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

George Washington

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
I'm Gonna Kick Your Ass!
A functioning Police State needs no police.

William S. Burroughs

Enter your email address to follow Mountain★Republic
and be notified of new posts
by email.

Member of The Internet Defense League

MR’s Latest Tweets

If you want to offend somebody, just tell him the truth.

Friedrich Nietzsche


       Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Dr. Judy Wood - Evidence of Breakthrough Energy on 9/11

9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover-Up Wide Open

Evidence That Won't Go Away! - September 11, 2001

JFK to 911: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick

Visit Mountain Re-Home
A project of Mountain★Republic