Senate moves to limit debate on unconstitutional legislation
by Paul Joseph Watson
The Senate has cleared the way for a final vote tomorrow on the National Defense Authorization Act, a provision of which would empower the U.S. military to operate on American soil, arrest American citizens and cart them off to detention centers anywhere in the world.
After the failure yesterday of an amendment that would have weakened Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which would turn the entire “homeland” into a battlefield and allow the military to arrest individuals accused of being terrorists and detain them indefinitely without trial, the Senate voted 88-12 today to limit debate on the legislation, clearing it for passage tomorrow.“A final vote on the bill could come as early as Thursday,” reports the Associated Press.
The provision was hashed out in secret by Senators Carl Levin and John McCain. Lindsay Graham, a supporter of the bill, explained that it would, “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield” and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial “American citizen or not.”
Republican Congressman Justin Amash called the provision of the bill, “one of the most anti-liberty pieces of legislation of our lifetime,” adding that the language had been “carefully crafted to mislead the public” in that the proposed law “does not preclude U.S. citizens from being detained indefinitely, without charge or trial, it simply makes such detention discretionary.”
Amash has been joined in his opposition to the bill by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who has introduced an amendment to strike Section 1031 from the legislation altogether. When Paul confronted McCain on the provision earlier this week, McCain confirmed that it would apply to American citizens accused of being terrorists.
Paul warned yesterday that the passage of the bill could see U.S. citizens arrested on American soil and sent to Guantanamo Bay.
Although the Obama administration has threatened to veto the bill, some observers believe Obama would rather avoid a political hot potato and sign it into law anyway.
“He has said he will. Whether he will is a difficult question because, politically, it’s difficult to veto a defense spending bill that 680 pages long and includes authorization to spend on a whole range of military programs,” Daphne Eviatar, Senior Associate, Human Rights First’s Law and Security Program, told Democracy Now.
source: ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill Set For Final Vote Thursday
Related articles:
- Senate Rejects Amendment to ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill
- Rand Paul Aims to Kill “Indefinite Detention” Provision of Controversial Bill
- Rand Paul: Americans Could Be Sent to Gitmo Under ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill
- A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully
- Supremes Rule in Favor of Indefinite Detention
- Senate Moves To Allow Military To Intern Americans Without Trial
- Obama Reaffirms Power of Indefinite Detention
- Top Counter-Terrorism Experts: Indefinite Detention Will INCREASE Terrorism
- Lindsey Graham: White House mulling indefinite detention
- Yes, Americans Will Be Targeted As Terrorists Under the NDAA
- Obama creates indefinite detention system for prisoners at Gitmo
- Senators Demand Military Lock Up Americans in “Battlefield” Defined as Outside Your Window
Pingback: How Congress is Signing Its Own Arrest Warrants in the NDAA Citizen Arrest Bill | Mountain Republic
Pingback: Thud of the Jackboot by ALEXANDER COCKBURN | ikners.com
Pingback: ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill Heads To Obama’s Desk As White House Drops Veto Threat | Mountain Republic
Pingback: The Indefinite Detention Bill DOES Apply to American Citizens on U.S. Soil | Mountain Republic
Pingback: 40 Members of Congress Protest ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill | Mountain Republic
Pingback: Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens | Mountain Republic
If there were Timothy McVeigh explosions going off every other day there might be a faint degree of supportability for such drastic limitation on and threats to habeus corpus. But that there are so few and rare incidents in this huge nation provides no justification at all. I am astonished that the vote was 88-12.
I agree. There doesn’t seem to be a need to debate legislation anymore….just a need to cram it down our throats.
They no longer represent us, so why to we keep sending them to Washington?
MR