Are vitamins really bad for you? Is drinking water giving you cancer? In our modern world, where so many variables exist within the chemical matrix of our food supply, the truth of the matter is that many ‘health’ studies are often quite deceiving.
I’ve been talking about the subject of such studies for years, because it’s such a key issue for me. Let’s use the example of vitamin studies to help you see why.Time and time again we see scientists presenting ‘conclusive’ research on things like vitamins and minerals. One study will proclaim that vitamin E causes birth defects, while the next will say it helps fetal development. Where in the world are they getting their data?
The simple reality is that many scientific studies aren’t disclosing the quality and source of the substances they’re studying. One group may be studying synthetic vitamin E made in China for 1 cent, while another is examining food-based vitamin E created in GMP certified US labs.
Trust Me, There’s a Big Difference…
I’ve worked with supplement manufacturers for years, and I have plenty of horror stories you wouldn’t believe. The lack of care that many companies have when it comes to their raw material sourcing is absolutely disturbing, and it just goes to show how careful you have to be when it comes to purchasing supplements for you and your family. It also goes to show how studies can really trick you when it comes to the ‘effectiveness’ of many vitamins.
When it comes to cheap synthetic vitamin forms, which are often contaminated with metals and toxic substances when they’re made overseas, of COURSE you’re going to find a correlation between consumption and disease if you perform a long-term study. But if you’re using an organic-based source, it’s likely you’ll find some really important benefits.
That’s Just Part of the Trick
As I explain in more detail in the video above, ANYONE can make ANYTHING look bad via ‘scientific research’ if they really want to. I could proclaim that broccoli gives you cancer if I fed herbicide-drenched broccoli to rats for extended periods of time. Obviously, it’d be the herbicide causing the cancer (much like the contamination and low quality of the synthetic vitamins), but since it’s been declared to be ‘safe’ by the FDA, I can completely ignore that fact.
It must be the Broccoli
Do you see how this game is played a bit more clearly now? It’s becoming a lot more apparent worldwide, especially as organizations like the WHO are openly declaring Monsanto’s products to be cancer-causing.
The bottom line? Don’t base your life around the latest health study, but instead use your own intelligence and deep research to determine a natural life plan that works for you. After all, look at the latest study on cellphone radiation that finally admits it has been giving us cancer for decades.
Studies for years have been telling us that we’re perfectly safe, and the media has been calling you a ‘conspiracy theorist’ if you took measures to avoid cellphone use.
In light of the Planned Parenthood scandal, Oregon Right to Life has released a revealing new video which explains the myriad of different gruesome ways in which babies are aborted.
While millions of Americans support abortion, the vast majority are unaware of the details of how the procedure is carried out. Some even think that babies are aborted in the same way that pets are euthanized – with little or no pain whatsoever.
The reality is infinitely more disturbing. Listed below are the different methods of abortion, as demonstrated in the video above by using lifelike scientific models and actual abortion instruments.
The doctor forces the woman’s cervix open prematurely, increasing the risk of premature birth by 36%. The abortionist turns the baby around so it is no longer head down, but head up. The baby is delivered so that just the head is left inside the mother’s body.
The abortionist then uses medical forceps to stab the baby in the back of its head, opening up a wound to make a hole, before using a vacuum tube to suck out the baby’s brain. He then crushes the baby’s head and delivers the dead baby.
If the abortionist performed the exact same procedure with the head outside the mother’s body, he would be guilty of homicide.
– Induction Abortion
The abortionist uses a 10 inch long needle to stab the baby in its heart before injecting Digoxin, causing a massive heart attack. The terrified baby feels the full force of the pain as anesthesia is not administered. Two or three days later the dead baby is delivered.
– Dilation and Evacuation
The abortionist artificially opens the mother’s cervix before reaching inside the uterus with a pair of medical forceps. The abortionist then grabs pieces of the baby with the forceps and rips the body limb from limb, pulling the pieces out one by one. This is a dangerous procedure because the doctor can accidentally grab a part of the woman’s bowel, causing internal rupturing.
A nurse then re-assembles the body to make sure no parts are left inside which could cause a dangerous infection.
– Dilation and Curettage
The abortionist uses a curette, a cross between a steak knife and a spoon, inserting it inside the mother’s body, before carving the baby into pieces and then using the spoon to scoop out the remains.
– Vacuum Aspiration
The abortionist simply uses a strong vacuum tube to suck out the entire baby, the placenta and the contents of the womb before the baby’s body is disposed of down a sink or as medical waste.
– Chemical Abortions
The mother takes a two part drug cocktail. The first drug blocks hormones, essentially telling the mother’s brain that she isn’t pregnant. Nutrients and support are then automatically cut off to the baby and it starves to death.
Two days later, the mother takes a second labor inducing drug which painfully flushes the dead baby out of her body. Although this method is used for early stage pregnancies, some women have reported seeing recognizable features of their baby in the toilet after it has been flushed out.
Planned Parenthood has described opponents of these abortion procedures as “extremists.” Personally speaking, if being against sticking knives in the back of babies’ heads and sucking out their brains makes me an extremist – then I’m proud to be an extremist.
Official White House photographs taken on the morning of September 11, 2001, recently released by the National Archives, have raised further questions about Vice President Dick Cheney’s role in the terrorist operation.
Instead of an individual startled by the morning’s events, Cheney is pictured watching the burning World Trade Center on television with his feet propped up on a desk. Above Cheney, on the wall, is a historical map of the Confederacy. One longtime Washington pundit observed that Cheney could have just as well been “watching a football game.”
Above: Cheney watching the WTC towers burn.
Other photos picture Cheney in the President’s Emergency Operations Center, located in a bunker under the White House. With him are his wife, Lynne Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Cheney’s chief of staff Scooter Libby. There appears to have been enough coffee for a large crowd with at least 60 paper coffee cups present on the conference table (below). The White House kitchen and mess had already self-evacuated, according to the late White House executive chef Walter Scheib. So, were the obviously catered coffee, pastries, and supplies pre-ordered for the morning’s big event? Scheib may have known but he died under suspicious circumstances in New Mexico last month.
Coffee and pastries at the PEOC appear to have been pre-ordered in advance. Were they? How did they arrive from a White House kitchen and mess undergoing a frantic evacuation? Cheney was evacuated at 9:03 am to the PEOC. The White House ushers and kitchen staff were already following the events on TV and PDAs. At 9:20, some staff began a self-evacuation of the White House. Six minutes later, Secret Service walkie-talkies crackled with the report that there was a plane incoming toward Washington. At 9:33, Reagan National Airport radar control informs the White House that a plane is heading for the mansion and is five miles to the West. But coffee and pastries were delivered to the PEOC sometime during this melee? Or were they already present in the PEOC in anticipation of a large crowd gathering there that morning?
The PEOC is not used for normal White House meetings. Those entering the reinforced top secret bunker 140 feet below the East Wing are required to have special access, something that is not granted to just any White House staffer. So who anticipated a large meeting at the PEOC that morning and why?
Cheney requested George W. Bush not to immediately return to the White House from Florida. Bush flew to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana and Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska before returning to DC later that evening. Bush appears more dumbfounded than he did in the elementary school in Sarasota.
Cheney looking like he is barely suppressing a smile while being briefed by his counsel David Addington.
Another small step for authoritarian bureaucracy, another massive leap forward in the destruction of Americans rights to due process and full protection under the law.
Increasingly, designations on watchlists, but official and unofficial, are replacing due process of suspicion, investigation, arrest, charge and trial, and skipping ahead to simply blacklist individuals and deny them equal rights.
This time, the legislation centers around passports, which would now be revoked upon any suspicion, whatsoever and despite a lack of evidence of wrongdoing, of links to foreign terrorists groups. But these links to ‘terrorism’ are not legally defined or limited, nor do they result as a penalty for criminal convictions, but from being added to a list. Gestapo, anyone?
A bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would allow the government to restrict Americans’ travel through the revocation of passports based upon mere suspicions of unscrupulous activity. This bill represents another dangerous step forward in the war on terror and the disintegration of American due process.
H.R. 237, the “FTO (Foreign Terrorist Organization) Passport Revocation Act of 2015,” will allow the U.S. Secretary of State the unchecked authority to prohibit individuals from traveling internationally. According to the bill, the Secretary may unilaterally revoke (or refuse to issue) a passport from “any individual whom the Secretary has determined has aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise helped an organization the Secretary has designated as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).”
The bill did not bother to define what the terms “aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise helped” actually mean, in legal terms. The power has been left open-ended so that it can mean whatever the secretary wants it to mean. Needless to say, a bill like this would be easily abused.
The travel restriction requires no presumption of innocence for the targeted individual; no explanation; no public presentation of evidence; no opportunity for a defense; no checks and balances on the power. The bill does not outline any appeals process for the targeted individual. The only stipulation is that the Secretary of State must issue a report to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs — “classified or unclassified.” The bill does not state that either committee can reverse the secretary’s decisions.
In over the top language, the bill’s sponsor Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) vows to go after “turned Americans” and subjecting them to a legal status backwards enough to predate the Magna Carta:
“The House has now acted to locate and contain these traitors,” Rep. Poe said in a press release. “These Benedict Arnold traitors who have turned against America and joined the ranks of foreign radical terrorist armies should lose all rights afforded to our citizens.”
Poe’s statement about “losing all rights” is rather startling, considering that about half of the Bill of Rights is explicitly written to protect people suspected of crimes from being abused by overzealous government! The dangers of a government wantonly revoking the rights of citizens just because the a bureaucrat puts them on a list would be severe indeed; fitting of a police state. Recall that these individuals can be targeted without even facing official charges of wrongdoing.
If trying to defend”freedom”, he has missed the point.
If owing allegiance to the fascist oligarchy, then be warned. Anyone deemed an “enemy” of the state, rightly or wrongly, has been targeted, while the entire population has been designated a potential enemy, monitored for suspicion and “examples.”
Poe’s bill is in close keeping with Sen. Lindsay Graham’s stunning endorsement of the NDAA, adamantly stating that “enemy combatants” do not get American rights, and do not get a lawyer, regardless of birthplace.
Consider what this could mean in cases where the person of interest is not a suspected member of ISIS, but a suspected patriot/militia/Constitutionalist/sovereign citizen. Can you be stripped of your rights for criticizing your leaders or speaking out about issues?
Already, millions of Americans have been placed on watchlists; many have found themselves denied the right to travel or participate in other activities, and unable to get off the watchlist, even if they were placed on the list by mistake, or if they were placed there without any legal charge of wrongdoing.
These concepts, even if cheered on in the context of fighting a terrorist enemy, are poorly defined and inviting abuse, and speeding up the destruction of our rights.
Using the words “American,” “obese,” “normal,” “mothering,” “fathering,” “homosexual,” “illegal alien,” and “senior citizens,” is offensive and should be discouraged, according to a “Bias-Free Language Guide” posted on the University of New Hampshire website.
The guide, first uncovered by Campus Reform, “is meant to invite inclusive excellence in [the] campus community.”
The word “American” is “problematic” according to the guide because it “assumes the U.S. is the only country inside [the continents of North and South America].”
Calling people “illegal aliens” is also politically incorrect, with the preferred term for undocumented immigrants being “person seeking asylum,” or “refugee,” while the word “foreigner” is discouraged and replaced with “international people.”
More banned words and phrases include;
– “Caucasian (replaced with “European-American individuals”);
– “Mothering” and “fathering” (replaced with “parenting” and “nurturing” so as to “avoid gendering a non-gendered activity”);
– “Homosexual” (replaced with “gay,” “lesbian,” “same gender loving”);
– “Obese” or “overweight” (replaced with “people of size”);
– Saying a person is “poor” (replaced with “person who lacks advantages that others have”);
– Saying the word “healthy” because it’s offensive to disabled people, who can’t be called disabled, they must be called a “person who is wheelchair mobile”).
“Terms also considered problematic include: “elders,” “senior citizen,” “overweight” (which the guide says is “arbitrary”), “speech impediment,” “dumb,” “sexual preference,” “manpower,” “freshmen,” “mailman,” and “chairman,” in addition to many others,” writes Peter Hasson.
The guide also rails against “ciscentrism,” which “includes the lack of gender-neutral restrooms, locker rooms, and residences” at the university.
To his credit, the president of the University of New Hampshire Mark Huddleston responded to the story by asserting that the guide was not official campus policy.
“I am troubled by many things in the language guide, especially the suggestion that the use of the term ‘American’ is misplaced or offensive,” he said. “The only UNH policy on speech is that it is free and unfettered on our campuses. It is ironic that what was probably a well-meaning effort to be ‘sensitive’ proves offensive to many people, myself included.”
Meanwhile, Republican State Senator Jeb Bradley has vowed to take the guide into consideration next time lawmakers decide how much money to give to the university.
“Implying the word ‘American’ is not appropriate to use on campus is un-American to say the least,” he said. “Will UNH next propose to change our Live Free or Die motto to Live Free but Upset No-One?”
The University of New Hampshire is by no means the only educational institution that is attempting to encourage censorious codes of political correctness on campus that completely contradict the notion of universities being bastions of free speech.
Earlier this month we reported on how the University of Wisconsin (Stevens Point) was teaching faculty members that all manner of harmless behaviors and phrases were examples of “racial microaggressions.”
The examples included; Asking someone where they are from or where they were born, telling someone they speak good English, telling someone that you have several black friends, saying that you’re not a racist, and complimenting an Asian person by telling them they are very articulate.
In a radical attack on the due-process rights of Americans that received virtually no media attention, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted to give the Obama administration the unilateral power to strip you of your passport and right to travel without a trial or even criminal charges. The scheme does not even include a way to challenge your status as a non-person involuntarily trapped inside U.S. borders on orders from the secretary of state. Lawmakers, some of whom could themselves be caught in the dragnet along with myriad administration officials, praised the effort as a way to stop alleged terrorists from traveling. But critics said it was yet another attack on the fundamental rights of Americans, such as due-process protections, and that it must be resisted.
As if to illustrate how out of touch with the U.S. Constitution most members of Congress have become, the legislation, HR 237, also known as “FTO (foreign terrorist organization) Passport Revocation Act,” did not even receive a recorded vote — supposedly because it was so “uncontroversial.” It passed after 15 minutes of alleged “debate.” Bill sponsor Ted Poe (R-Texas) claimed the measure, adopted under a “suspension of the rules” typically used for trivialities such as renaming post offices, was passed unanimously. Of course, in an age in which the White House openly claims the unilateral authority to murder or indefinitely detain American citizens without even charging them with a crime, passport revocations likely seem trivial by comparison. But opponents of the measure said it was a big deal nonetheless.
Under the bill, “the Secretary of State may refuse to issue a passport to any individual whom the Secretary has determined has aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise helped an organization the Secretary has designated as a foreign terrorist organization,” the text states. “The Secretary of State may revoke a passport previously issued to any individual” whom Secretary of State John Kerry, or future administrations that could be even more radical, unilaterally decides may have done any of those things. The terms are left undefined, opening up widespread potential for abuse, and there is no appeals process outlined in the legislation.
In essence, if approved by the Senate and signed into law by Obama, one man — far-left radical Kerry, for now — would have the power to strip you of your unalienable, God-given rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Under the measure, individuals targeted by Kerry or his successors would have no right to due-process of law — no trial by jury, no chance to contest the findings in open court (or anywhere else), no right to be presumed innocent before proven guilty, not even a right to see the accusations. Indeed, even actual criminal charges are unnecessary under the scheme for somebody to be permanently trapped in or out of the United States based on secret evidence, with no mechanism to appeal.
In a recently released report titled “Estimating Ebola Treatment Needs, United States,” the CDC is still playing down its latest round of fear-mongering for the virus which was “meant to infect every man, woman, and child in the US.” To date, and by their own admission there have been only 10 cases in the entire U.S.
How disappointing for the makers of the Ebola vaccine. Especially when publications like the LiberianObserver, in a piece by Dr. Cyril Broderick, expose how its “likely manufactured by Big Pharma.”
Dr. Cyril Broderick is a former professor of plant pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry, and is on tenure as an associate at Delaware University.
The truth is in this video. Dr. Broderick references Dr. Leonard Horowitz in the Liberian Observer article. He presents substantial evidence which explains this tidbit:
“[Horowitz]. . .unearthed and reprinted stunning scientific documents and National Institutes of Health contracts proving that chimpanzees, contaminated with numerous viruses, were used to produce hundreds of hepatitis B vaccine doses administered to central African Blacks along with homosexual men in New York City at precisely the time Dr. Myers and colleagues claim the origin of HIV ‘punctuated event’ occurred.”
Some are saying that not only was the HIV virus likely man-made, but so was Ebola. Who knows which other pandemic diseases are created so the mainstream medical system can profit from them.
Just look at us. Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, major media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
The United States has been declared under martial law. All constitutional rights have been suspended. Anyone interfering with the collection of urine samples will be shot. Anyone failing to attend morning school prayer will be shot. The number one enemy of progress is questions. National security is more important than individual rights. Sports broadcasts will proceed as scheduled. Shut up, be happy, obey all orders without question. At last everything is done for you.
POLICE STATE USA
You learn that you either are going to have a police state where you don't have any freedom left, or you're going to build a world that doesn't create terrorists, and that means a whole different way of getting along.